de.tech.ting

Google's Sergey Brin remembers his teacher

Posted by andreaitis on June 6, 2009

Rajeev Motwani

Image by drona via Flickr

We know the faces of modern technology: Bill Gates. Steve Jobs. Sergey Brin and Larry Page.

We don’t often know the faces behind them, the people who advise and guide and push.

Stanford Professor and savvy angel investor Rajeev Motwani was one of those faces. Today, the tech community is still reeling from his unexpected and untimely death.  Google founder Sergey Brin is among those trying to make sense of it.

As he wrote on his blog:

It is with great sadness that I write about the passing of my teacher and good friend Professor Rajeev Motwani. But I would rather not dwell on the sorrow of his death and instead celebrate his life.

Officially, Rajeev was not my advisor, and yet he played just as big a role in my research, education, and professional development. In addition to being a brilliant computer scientist, Rajeev was a very kind and amicable person and his door was always open. No matter what was going on with my life or work, I could always stop by his office for an interesting conversation and a friendly smile.

When my interest turned to data mining, Rajeev helped to coordinate a regular meeting group on the subject. Even though I was just one of hundreds of graduate students in the department, he always made the time and effort to help. Later, when Larry and I began to work together on the research that would lead to Google, Rajeev was there to support us and guide us through challenges, both technical and organizational.

via too: Remembering Rajeev

Professor Motwani founded the Mining Data at Stanford project (MIDAS), an umbrella organization exploring next-gen data management concepts. As an academic, he focused on web search,  data privacy, robotics, computational drug design and theoretical computer science.  He As a friend and advisor, he was always helpful…and always there.

Om Malik remembers:

I have known Rajeev, his wife Asha and their family for a long time. Rajeev, like me, was from New Delhi. In my professional career (and personal moments of crisis) Rajeev was only a phone call away, sharing his vast rolodex. Just like a true friend. Only a few weeks back, I had a simple Indian lunch in his house with his family. I am sure, I am not the only one who has benefited from his generosity of time and knowledge and his ability to create connections and help others.

Events like this force us to reflect, to think of and hopefully thank those who have helped us along our way.  While many never even  heard of  Professor Motwani before now, Sergey Brin reminds us:

Today, whenever you use a piece of technology, there is a good chance a little bit of Rajeev Motwani is behind it.

We wish his family comfort and strength.

Posted in technology | Tagged: , , , | 1 Comment »

Did Sacha Baron Cohen rip off Howard Stern?

Posted by andreaitis on June 5, 2009

Bruno sits on Eminems Face!

I’m having flash-backs (so to speak).  It’s 1992 and I’m watching the MTV Video Music Awards.   Suddenly, everyone looks up: it’s a bird…it’s a plane…it’s…Fartman!!  He descended from the rafters, flying with cheeks bared in all of his fartastic glory.

Seventeen years later, enter Bruno at the MTV Movie Awards. He descended from the rafters, flying with cheeks bared in all of his fawntastic glory.

Hmm.

Sacha Baron Cohen may have had a more dramatic landing in Eminem’s lap, but Howard Stern did pretty well with Luke Perry.  Let’s go to the videotape…

Howard Stern’s Fartman, MTV Video Music Awards 1992

[youtubevid id=S3Zq2HzJH6s]

Sacha Baron Cohen’s Bruno, MTV Movie Awards 2009

[youtubevid id=sfK6Ni62Lco]

Posted in Entertainment | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Google Wave vs Microsoft Vine: Who wins the Next Big Thing contest?

Posted by andreaitis on May 29, 2009

Google unveiled its Next Big Thing at the  I/O Developer conference this week.   Geeks everywhere are drooling all over their keyboards, waiting to get their twitchy fingers on Google Wave.  A project more than four years in the making, its primary goal is to bring all communication needs together in a single, fluid experience.

A “wave” is equal parts conversation and document, where people can communicate and work together with richly formatted text, photos, videos, maps, and more.

Google Wave

Here’s how it works: In Google Wave you create a wave and add people to it. Everyone on your wave can use richly formatted text, photos, gadgets, and even feeds from other sources on the web. They can insert a reply or edit the wave directly. It’s concurrent rich-text editing, where you see on your screen nearly instantly what your fellow collaborators are typing in your wave. That means Google Wave is just as well suited for quick messages as for persistent content — it allows for both collaboration and communication. You can also use “playback” to rewind the wave and see how it evolved.

Official Google Blog: Went Walkabout. Brought back Google Wave

Sounds pretty cool…but, also sounded a little familiar…and then I remembered another recent announcement, microsoft-vinefrom another big gig company: Microsoft Vine, blending Twitter, Facebook and Google in its own  attempt to be the Next Big Thing.

They are not identical offerings, but they are trending in the same direction and there is some overlap.    Microsoft is taking a more traditional approach, looking at a particular type of communication between smaller groups,  and trying to make that multi-dimensional with mapping, alerts and location (see the demo here).  Google is using a much broader definition, thinking about communication tied to personal interaction, work and collaboration, in addition to streamlining tools we currently use.  If Google succeeds, email, IM, texting and twittering may merge into a single experience.

With Wave and Vine in the works and the continuing Twitter buzz, we see what our future holds.  The next phase of digital innovation will focus on  social and  real-time aspects of communication, search and mobility.   With hope, that means greater flexibility and interaction using fewer tools and devices.

Who will conquer this world?  When you add Wave to Android, Chrome, Maps, Earth, Gmail, Gtalk and (of course) Search…the smart money’s still on Google.   I say that begrudgingly because, at the end of the day, it all comes at a price.   Big Brother’s not watching.  Google is.

Posted in technology | Tagged: , , , , | 6 Comments »

Mark Cuban says Internet has jumped the shark (except for his DWTS videos)

Posted by andreaitis on May 28, 2009

You always know when Mark Cuban is in the room.  Or on the basketball court.  Or the dance floor.  This time, he was speaking at D7, the All Things D conference.   Did he say newspapers are dead?  Nope.  He said the thing that’s killing newspapers is dead.  That’s right, the Internet is staid and boring.  And video on the Internet? Utterly disappointing.

“I think it’s a real disappointment to see where Internet video has come,” Cuban said, noting that the industry still doesn’t have advertising standards, among other shortcomings.

Other shortcomings…hmm…like his Dancing with the Stars videos up on YouTube?

[youtubevid id=JkFS1aa9Lz4]

Posted in Entertainment, technology | Tagged: , , , , , | 1 Comment »

Traditional media makes an untraditional move

Posted by andreaitis on May 26, 2009

First, the June 1 cover of The New Yorker is created using a $4.99 iPhone app.

Now, the New York Times has hired a social media editor.

Right about here someone should yell “Stop the presses!”.

As readwriteweb.com notes:

It has come to this; the flagship institution of traditional journalism now has an editor level position dedicated to new media.

Little is known about Preston’s personal use of social media, she’s either using aliases or is remarkably quiet around the web, and details are still forthcoming about the new position she’ll fill. The Times has done a remarkable job of engaging with social media so far, though, and we have high hopes for this new post.

Preston has worked at the New York Times for more than a decade, and spent the last two years running the regional weekly sections and content for nytimes.com/intheregion.  She’s also an adjunct professor at Columbia University and a book author.   When RWW did some due diligence on her social media prowess, this is what they found:

She has a private Twitter account that she’s just begun to open up this morning – but apparently she hasn’t published any tweets there yet, ever. She is following almost 160 people so far, though, far more than are following her to date. So she could be using it for listening.

She’s also got a private FriendFeed account, a private Yahoo account and an unused Tumblr account. The BackType comment search engine can’t find any comments she’s left on blogs around the web.

After this announcement, her Twitter followers shot up to over 2000, and she was actively engaging with twitterers in her debut as Social Media Editor.

Two  steps forward in this expect-the-unexpected week.  Are they gimmicks, shallow nods…or a real effort to move beyond the page?  Does it really matter?  It’ll get people talking and thinking and perhaps push others to do something unexpected and untraditional.   Traditional media needs to try and test and tamper, to experiment and maybe even blow up now and then.    You gotta light the match before you start the fire.  And lord knows, there’s plenty of paper to burn.

Posted in media, technology | Tagged: , , , , | 1 Comment »

Twitter to make a TV show about…nothing

Posted by andreaitis on May 25, 2009

Braun HF 1, Germany, 1959

Image via Wikipedia

I saw this and thought: Well, of course. Why not turn Twitter loose on TV, if for no other reason than it’s the N.H.T. New.  Hot. Thing.  Can’t blame the Twitter guys, who wouldn’t take advantage of the surge in popularity?  But I feel compelled to translate this story about the up-and-coming collaboration.

The San Francisco-based web phenom has partnered with Reveille and Brillstein Entertainment to develop an unscripted TV skein…

Stop right there.  An “unscripted TV skein”?  What does that even mean??  Maybe we’ll get a clue in the rest of the sentence.

…described as “putting ordinary people on the trail of celebrities in a revolutionary competitive format.”

Nope, no clue.  Not even a quarter to buy a clue.  Sounds like ordinary people will stalk celebrities. Maybe it’s a cross between Punk’d and Amazing Race.  Maybe it’s totally ripping off Shaq’s twitter technique, where he twitters his location and whoever gets to him first gets basketball tix. Maybe they have no idea what the show is about so they’re using vague phrasing, an incoherent skein of words.

Project was announced with few details…

Few details! Shocker.

…Monday by Reveille and Brillstein Entertainment. Series concept was created by novelist/screenwriter Amy Ephron, who will exec produce with Kevin Foxe and Steve Latham, Reveille’s Mark Koops and Howard T. Owens, Brillstein’s Jon Liebman and Lee Kernis.

If my math is correct, that’s seven executive producers.  S-E-V-E-N.  They’re already over budget.

“We’ve found a compelling way to bring the immediacy of Twitter to life on TV,” Liebman said.

Another sentence that says nothing.

Worldwide rights to the show will be repped by ShineReveille Intl.

And there’s the pitch, they’re already trying to sell rights to a show about nothing so the rest of the world can share in the compelling revolutionary twitastic television experience.

via Twitter, Brillstein develop TV series – Entertainment News, Technology News, Media – Variety

To recap: Seven executive producers, two mediums melding, a fraction of a concept. I know nothing worked for Seinfeld, but can nothing become something this time?  Call me a cynic, but sounds like the traditional TV development machine is already processing them like cheese.  I’d have more faith if they had done the TV pitch in 140 characters.

Update:  One of Twitter’s founders, Biz Stone,  posted on the Twitter blog to clear up the confusion.

There is no official Twitter TV show—although if there were it would be fun to cast! In dealing with networks and production companies we sometimes have simple agreements. Regarding the Reveille and Brillstein project reported today, we have a lightweight, non-exclusive, agreement with the producers which helps them move forward more freely.

Lightweight, non-exclusive agreement.   That almost sounds like it’s an agreement to agree about something at some point which, for now, pretty much adds up to….yeah, nothing.

Posted in Entertainment, technology | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

Artist + iPhone App + 1 hour = New Yorker cover

Posted by andreaitis on May 25, 2009

Is this a gimmick, or a turning point?  With the iPhone and the Kindle, this could be the redefining moment for  graphic artists and cover art.  Will there be an uprising or a welcome embrace?

Artist Jorge Colombo took about an hour to fingerpaint an intricate Times Square scene on his iPhone using Brushes, a $4.99 iPhone drawing app. Now, it’s the June 1st cover for The New Yorker.

The New Yorker via iPhone App

Gizmodo – June 1st New Yorker Cover Drawn Entirely on the iPhone – Iphone new yorker cover

Posted in Entertainment, technology | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

New site calls out the twit-wits. And not in a good way.

Posted by andreaitis on May 20, 2009

The hate is on.  Or, perhaps, the mockery, snark and smirk.  Four pretty funny guys have launched Tweeting Too Hard, a site that brings us the “self-importance, pretense, braggadocio—it’s all here and it’s laid bare for the scoffing.”

It’s the Digg of twitter messages, where we in our self-righteous  right-ness get to vote on who’s twittering like a twit-wit.  Because, y’know, OUR twitter messages would certainly never appear there.  Um, right?  Sheesh.  As if we needed more pressure on a measly 140 characters…

Tweeting Too Hard

The concept is simple. You submit and vote for the most blatantly self-absorbed tweets that you see on Twitter. The most popular recent tweets get voted to the top. Like the million of other web sites that offer this sort of voting feature, you can also sort by “newly added,” “randoms,” and “today’s top.”

Tweeting Too Hard: A site for shaming the twitteringly self-important » VentureBeat

Posted in technology, twitter | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

WSJ Rules of Engagement

Posted by andreaitis on May 14, 2009

Image representing Twitter as depicted in Crun...

Image via CrunchBase

Staffers at The Wall Street Journal were the lucky recipients this week of rules for “professional conduct.”   These rules included a long and specific list related to social media and social networking.

Dow Jones spokesman Robert Christie declined to comment to E&P today on why the updated rules were put out at this time, saying they speak for themselves. But it is clear they are in place for those involved in social networking on the likes of Facebook or Twitter, requiring editor approval before “friending” any confidential sources.

“Openly ‘friending’ sources is akin to publicly publishing your Rolodex,” the rules state, adding, “don’t disparage the work of colleagues or competitors or aggressively promote your coverage,” and “don’t engage in any impolite dialogue with those who may challenge your work — no matter how rude or provocative they may seem.”

New ‘WSJ’ Conduct Rules Target Twitter, Facebook

I get why you shouldn’t ‘friend’ a source.  That’s pure common sense, the same way a cop wouldn’t ‘friend’ an informant’ or a lawyer wouldn’t ‘friend’ a key witness.  But don’t aggressively promote your work?  Sure, you don’t want to spam people but promoting your work on social media sites is one way to, y’know, get people to read it.  To draw attention, create a debate, engage the audience.

I think this one is my favorite though:

“Business and pleasure should not be mixed on services like Twitter. Common sense should prevail, but if you are in doubt about the appropriateness of a Tweet or posting, discuss it with your editor before sending.”

Don’t mix business and pleasure on Twitter.

Discuss a Twitter message with an editor before tweeting it.

Um, really?   Does the person who wrote these rules have anything other than a cursory knowledge of Twitter, Facebook and other social media?   Did anyone raise a hand and say, “The point’s over here and you’re missing it”?

For an industry that is supposed to support free speech, inquiry, discourse,  and — at its core — curiosity, I just don’t get how they don’t get it.

I do agree with one point, however.  Common sense should prevail.  Unfortunately, there’s not much common sense in these rules of engagement.

You can see the entire list of rules for online behavior, along with the other rules of conduct included in the e-mail.   What’s your favorite?  And what rules did they miss?

Posted in technology, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

Google's Search Party

Posted by andreaitis on May 12, 2009

The press got an “insider’s perspective on search” today at Google’s annual Searchology event.   There was  live-blogging, webcasting and twittering galore as Marissa Mayer, VP of Search Products and User Experience, and a  team of Googlers gathered in building 40 at the Googleplex.

Udi Manber kicks the event off saying “our job is to do rocket science that will be taken for granted.” But, he adds, “there is still a lot of work to do.”

He continues talking about growth throughout the centuries. “In the 20th century,” he explains, the dream was to conquer nature; I think the 21st centure will be about understanding people.”

“We have made a lot of progress, and you’ll see some more today. But, the most promising advance is that we are starting to ‘understand.'”

“We have very high confidence that this is what you’re looking for. It’s actually hard to do, but it looks easy to you.”

“Search has to be lightening fast, relevant comprehensive fresh, but the main point is that even that is not enough.”

He ends by juggling three eggs. Then saying “I wanted to highlight that things are not always what they seem,” he throws the eggs, and they bounce off the stage.

via Searchology: State of the Union of Search at Google – ReadWriteWeb.

During the event, Google announced three new search products coming soon:  Google Squared, Rich Snippets and a new Android application called Sky Map.  They also revealed that they had seen an early version of the much-anticipated Wolfram, a “computational knowledge engine” launching this month.

A little competition would be a good thing, for all of us…

Posted in technology | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »